Monday, 29 May 2017

“Was he on your radar?” - media vultures descend on South Manchester

“Was he on your radar? Do you know about his links to gangs?”

These were the questions the two journalists from Panorama asked us. I work at a small community centre in South Manchester. It has been an understandably difficult week for our local area after the bombing: police raids, controlled explosions, helicopters and drones, rumours and hearsay. Then there’s the press who have swarmed our neighbourhoods, demanding answers to questions that it’s not their place to ask.

On Thursday these two BBC journos dropped by uninvited, insisting on an audience with our youth work co-ordinator. He’d already said that he didn’t want to speak to the press and, besides, he was in a meeting. But they wouldn’t take no for an answer. They felt entitled to camp out in our reception until we dished enough dirt to satisfy them. When we pointed out that it wasn’t our priority to help the press to once again smear our community, they reacted dismissively: “we’re not the red tops just looking for a sensational quote. We’re making a proper documentary about the bomber.” Quite.

The first question to ask is: if you’re making a “proper” documentary, why is it going out on Monday evening, less than a week after the bombing? If you’re going to take a considered look at how a young man could do something like this, why the hurry?

And the second question: if you’re going to treat South Manchester fairly, why come right out with a question about gangs?

We kicked them out.

Trying to make sense of this tragedy is crucial, but it’s a long-term process. The news-cycle is short: even if the press ask relevant questions they’re not going to stick around for the answers. I can’t imagine Monday’s documentary will draw any useful conclusions. The community here is still coming to terms with what has happened – how can these outsiders, working to a deadline, make any sense of the situation?

The press aren’t really interested in the truth. They want broad emotions and simple narratives. On Thursday morning I visited St. Ann’s Square to see the floral tributes that have been appearing since the bombing. I was foolish enough to think I could have a moment of quiet reflection. Instead I found the memorial entirely surrounded by news crews from every corner of the globe. You couldn’t approach the sea of tributes without walking in to somebody’s shot. I noticed a few individuals stood nervously at the edge of the square clutching flowers, clearly needing to mourn… just not in view of the whole world.

There’s no journalistic reason why a piece to camera three days after the bombing had to be done here. What’s wrong with, say, Albert Square? The gothic Town Hall makes a beautiful backdrop, whilst Manchester’s citizens could be left to grieve in peace. But no, these journalists – all of them! – decided to depict Manchester in mourning because that’s what sells. Our city’s pain reduced to a commodity. Twenty two dead and scores injured, but journalists have a job to do. It’s all business and it’s got fuck-all to do with truth.

And if those two BBC clowns are anything to go by, you can be sure that’s what you’ll see if you tune in to Panorama tonight. The tired racist clichés about South Manchester that have been selling papers for decades. Guns and gangs, disaffected youth and dangerous streets – now with the added spice of terrorism. This isn’t about examining the complexity of how something like this happens. It’s about cashing in before you have to roll on to the next tragedy. When we do start to make sense of it all, you can be sure the media circus will no longer be in sight.


A lot has been said this week about cuts to police numbers but other questions are going unasked. Why have so many of our community resources been lost in the last few years? In March we were shocked by the sudden closure of Ladybarn Community Centre, a move the council is refusing to explain. Last year Hulme lost its Aquarius Centre. Millions of pounds have been slashed from council youth budgets. The national press have been eager to report on the bomber’s alleged links to gang violence, but what about the brutal economic war that has been waged on our city in recent years? At the end of the day, complex stories obviously don’t sell.

Do we really need "progressive" commentators?

Earlier this week Owen Jones wrote an opinion piece for the Guardian entitled ‘We can no longer pretend the British press is impartial’ . ...